SpamAssassin charset rule problem in F8

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 21:04 +0930, Tim wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 13:08 +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> > I'm not sure it's the right place for a such question, but I need
> > experts feedback. 
> 
> It's not...  You've replied to another thread, and buried your
> completely different topic in the middle of it.  People ignoring this
> thread will not see your message.  People who get annoyed by thread
> hijacking will deliberately not reply to your query.  Your message was
> not a reply to the prior post, do not use the reply feature in a mail
> client for the wrong purpose.
> 
> Try again, this time *create* *a* *new* message.  And I mean that
> precisely - use the function in your mail client to "create a new
> message", do not reply to some other message then modify things.
> 
> You probably will get someone replying about spam assassin, or more or
> better replies, that way.

Agreed, this really pisses me off. However some people don't realize
they're doing it because in certain Redmond-based mail clients a new
subject counts as starting a new thread (thread sorting is based on
subject rather than -- or in preference to -- the standard Reply-To
header). I notice the OP is using one of the aforementioned clients.

poc