fedora 8 hacked?

Roger Heflin rogerheflin at gmail.com
Sat Apr 26 18:33:31 UTC 2008


Markus Kesaromous wrote:
> How about installing a well configured firewall?
> 
> ----------------------------------------
>> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2008 12:26:37 -0500
>> From: rogerheflin at gmail.com
>> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
>> Subject: Re: fedora 8 hacked?
>>
>> tom lee wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 9:20 AM, Roger Heflin  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Because, if you keep writing to a corrupted filesystem you can end up
>>>> destroying the entire filesystem completely and lose *ALL* of your data and
>>>> that is worse.
>>> I agree with you. That is why I think the OS should better off with
>>> reboot "showdown -r -F now"
>>> instead of mounting as read-only. if there is potencial disk problem,
>>> you need to run this command anyway no matter what problems you may
>>> find before rebooting.
>> If you automatically reboot, you make the problem go away, but don't have any 
>> details on what happened (cannot log) so it *WILL* happen again, automatically 
>> reboot helps recover from the issue, but results in the loss of all details that 
>> could be used to fix the issue.
>>
>>>> The problem is that it may or may not crash before it destroys the
>>>> filesystem competely, and if the OS is written robustly it should not crash
>>>> just because the filesystem tables are corrupted (and Linux has done some
>>>> testing with something that puts random data on the filesystem to make sure
>>>> that it does not crash in those random corrupted data cases).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> From this perspective, I  think microsoft way of crasing is a better
>>>>>>
>>>>> design. at least you know some wrong right away and reboot the
>>>>> computer automatically can get it fixed.
>>>>>
>>>> That was not their design, MS tends to try to work around errors rather than
>>>> report the errors, so if then you get an error, it tries to cope and then
>>>> you get a completely unrelated cryptic error that really tells you nothing.
>>>> If if the crash said nothing useful to identify the failing component is it
>>>> useless, you have no idea what to fix, just crashing tells someone nothing.
>>>>
>>>> If you had checked dmesg there should have been a clear error indicating
>>>> what happened, if all of the partitions on the filesystem were RO then I
>>>> would suspect that the disk itself quit talking, next time make sure to
>>>> check dmesg and see what it says.
>>> ok. so it is too late to check since I already rebooted the OS?
>> Yeap, too late, if the root filesystem goes RO it does not leave any tracks 
>> except in dmesg.
>>
>> I have seen the RO remount a number of times on lots of different HW/kernel/dist 
>> combinations, it is can be any number of issues, from a real hardware issue, a 
>> hardware driver issue, a filesystem driver issue, a bios issue, a main kernel 
>> issue, ... it has a lot of causes.
>>
>> If it happens again, type "dmesg" and if possible save it someplace that it not 
>> readonly (type sync a few times to make sure it gets saved-or put it on a flash 
>> driver and if you have another device verify you have it), and then reboot.
>>
>>                                    Roger
>>
>> -- 

Markus,

Please do Not top-post.

Installing a well configured firewall does not in any way change his problem, it 
is unlikely to be a hacking issue, it is almost certainly a real problem of some 
sort.

People that break in to machine won't do anything (for the most part) to make 
the machine obviously wrong (they want to hijack it for their own usage, or 
completely destroy it), and breaking it to and and doing something obvious will 
cause them to be more likely to get caught.   The RO has no point for a hacker, 
either they will "rm -r" your filesystem or do something else to cause major 
damage, or they will quietly use your cpu/diskspace/network connection for their 
own usages.    It is not that easy to accidently cause a RO mount and it is 
rather pointless to do on purpose, so it is a lot more likely that it was a 
hardware/software failure.


                              Roger

                            Roger




More information about the fedora-list mailing list