Anaconda (or libata?) device detection order
Christopher Mocock
chris at wavestore.com
Fri Aug 22 11:12:18 UTC 2008
Alan Cox wrote:
>> I do not think that there is any way for anaconda, given the constraints
>> of libata and the BIOS, to determine if the first drive offered is PATA.
>
> In theory you can map BIOS drives to PCI devices using EDD 3.0 tables and
> then use word 93 of the identify data to map the devices to PATA v SATA.
>
> In practice EDD tables seem to be pretty good but various devices get
> word 93 wrong - notably cruddy ATAPI devices.
>
> Our current order is basically
>
> - link order for compiled in drivers (if any), which is fairly undefined
> but does put acpi, generic, legacy last
>
> - module load order otherwise
>
> For multiple devices off the same module it is then defined by the PCI
> bus ordering of devices which depends on the PCI scan order.
>
> The order modules get loaded is from userspace
Thanks, that's all useful info. Maybe I can use it to figure out a solution.
--
Chris
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list