The Scope and Ownership of fedora-list
Patrick O'Callaghan
pocallaghan at gmail.com
Thu Aug 28 17:37:00 UTC 2008
On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 01:06 +0800, Fennix wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 12:09 AM, Mike Chambers <mike at miketc.net>
> wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 10:32 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
>
> > It's (traditional) C. Put it into a file like self-rep.c and
> then
> >
> > $ gcc -o self-rep self-rep.c
> > $ ./self-rep
> >
> > and see what happens.
>
>
> [mike at scrappy ~]$ gcc -o test test.c
> test.c:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage
> class
> test.c:1: warning: initialization makes integer from pointer
> without a
> cast
> test.c: In function 'main':
> test.c:1: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of
> built-in
> function 'printf'
> test.c:1: warning: passing argument 1 of 'printf' makes
> pointer from
> integer without a cast
> [mike at scrappy ~]$ ./test
> p="p=%c%s%
> c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}[mike at scrappy
> ~]$
>
> That's what happened when doing it on a F9 box.
>
> --
> Mike Chambers
> Fedora Project - Ambassador, Bug Zapper, Tester, User, etc..
> mikec302 at fedoraproject.org
>
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>
>
> Hmmm... c++ vs standard C?
It's not C++. The compiler warnings are because it violates the current
C standard regarding type safety. It would have compiled on a Unix
system 25 years ago without complaint, but now you'd need to add flags
to the gcc line to make it shut up.
poc
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list