Intel 965GM chipset with compiz

Craig Preston duffman23 at gmail.com
Mon Aug 11 06:35:48 UTC 2008


I am using F9 with the intel chipset. With desktop effects turned on, the
cube and wobble windows and all that stuff works fine. Video and multimedia
all seemed to be fine as well, but scrolling in Firefox was terrible. Turn
it off and scrolling is back to normal.

I have left it off for the time being until i find a solution (not that i've
really looked)

2008/8/11 John Priddy <jpriddy at redhat.com>

> Hmm, yeah sounds like you have things working fine.  I'll go back and
> revisit my xorg conf / reread the wiki.  Thanks, its actually quite
> helpful to know at least someone out there has this working on the same
> chipset.  Last time I took a look at this it was the same week FC9 came
> out, so perhaps there have been some developments since then.
>
> --John
>
>
> On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 11:29 +0000, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 August 2008 05:12, John Priddy wrote:
> > > Is anyone out there using this chipset on FC9 with acceptable video
> > > performance?
> >
> > Depending on what "acceptable" means. Works for me.
> >
> > > My performance issues are especially noticeable when
> > > 'scrolling' (for lack of a better word).  It is awful running mozilla,
> > > but its pretty poor using nautilus as well as others.
> >
> > I guess that scrolling is up to the user-app, and can be implemented
> poorly. I
> > also remember that mozilla/firefox was pretty slow in that, while some
> other
> > apps (kdvi, kghostview etc.) were smooth.
> >
> > > glxgears framerate is in the single digits.
> >
> > $ glxgears
> > 3402 frames in 5.0 seconds = 680.271 FPS
> > 3626 frames in 5.0 seconds = 725.081 FPS
> > 3615 frames in 5.0 seconds = 722.802 FPS
> > 3593 frames in 5.0 seconds = 718.598 FPS
> > 3620 frames in 5.0 seconds = 723.859 FPS
> > 3597 frames in 5.0 seconds = 719.374 FPS
> >
> > This is with compiz-fusion turned on. It seems slow, but is not
> single-digit
> > slow. :-) I suspect this is regular intel performance?
> >
> > > Below is output from glxinfo:
> > > name of display: :0.0
> > > display: :0  screen: 0
> > > direct rendering: Yes
> > > server glx vendor string: SGI
> > > server glx version string: 1.2
> >
> > Same here. I am not an expert here, but have this chipset, so I can
> suggest
> > you to go to the compiz-fusion home page, and in their wiki you can find
> > pretty exact instructions on how to prepare xorg.conf for intel chipset
> with
> > AIGLX. This is what I did, and it works reasonably well (for me).
> >
> > HTH, :-)
> > Marko
> >
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080811/9a4991ac/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list