Where the h%^&^%$#! is KDE 4.1 ? Part II

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Ric Moore <wayward4now at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2008-08-13 at 18:37 -0500, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 4:43 PM, linuxguy <linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Its now 2 weeks past the end of July, when we were told KDE 4.1 would
>> > ship.
>>
>> It has.
>>
>> > I've been stuck with this crappy, half working KDE 4.0 interface
>> > for 6 weeks.  You could say I'm a bit miffed.
>>
>> Sucks for you.
>>
>> > Say whatever you want about Fedora being bleeding edge, etc, but this is
>> > by far the worst release Fedora and Redhat has ever done.
>>
>> What does RedHat have to do with this?
>>
>> > As far as I
>> > am concerned, the KDE team has knocked the credibility of Linux, Fedora
>> > and the KDE team itself way, way back.
>>
>> Interesting opinion, I can't say I understand it. I'd argue you have
>> done more damage. I'm willing to put together a few points if you're
>> interested.
>>
>> > I am very disappointed with the current state of the Linux desktop as
>> > demonstrated in F9.
>>
>> Gnome actually is pretty nice, not that I would use it full time... or
>> by Linux desktop did you mean the K Desktop environment?
>>
>> > The people that allowed KDE4.0 to ship in F9 showed
>> > a huge lapse in judgment.
>>
>> How so? I think they underestimated how many freeloaders would bitch
>> about not having what they want when they want it.
>
> You STILL labeling people again??


Yes, why do you ask?


-- 
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )