non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Björn Persson]

max wrote:
> You had no idea there was a security
> issue? It was the first thing to cross my mind when I first saw the
> announcement. What else could it have been? Why else the cryptic
> message?

You're lucky to be that paranoid. Many people would call me paranoid if they 
knew what kind of security measures I take with my home computers, but 
apparently I'm not paranoid enough yet.

Can you answer the opposite question: Why the cryptic message? Can you think 
of a rational reason to avoid the word "security"? Something more concrete 
than just "legal issues"?

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080824/62edc6ef/attachment-0001.sig>