Java and openjdk

[Gene Heskett]

On Friday 29 August 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 13:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
>>>> What in the hell are you talking about?  The sentence was a question,
>>>> not a statement, in text, no less.  How obtuse do you have to be in
>>>> order to miss that?
>>>
>>> You can always phrase a question and still presume things.
>>
>> However the only person that knows the presumption for sure is the one
>> phrasing the question.
>
>In many cases, it is quite obvious that the question is not serious
>especially when some people use that often as a technique in a debate.
>Feel free to jump up and down and claim otherwise.
>
>Rahul

And the simple fact that those of us who want a working java are going to the 
sun site, getting the latest jre and installing it, never again to click on 
an ICED TEA update in yumex.  Really, I think that says it all.  You for 
legal reasons are defending an emasculated version, but the final say on what 
gets run is us, its our machine.  Sue us?  I doubt it. :)

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Your wise men don't know how it feels
To be thick as a brick.
		-- Jethro Tull, "Thick As A Brick"