Selinux
Bruno Wolff III
bruno at wolff.to
Mon Dec 1 18:49:44 UTC 2008
On Mon, Dec 01, 2008 at 13:35:12 -0500,
Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I assume that the QA process includes someone actually installing
> the application and seeing that it works. I would rather see things sit
> in updates-testing until someone is willing to sign off that they
> actually have been at least smoke tested?
That doesn't mean that filing bugs to get problems fixed (or at least
tracked) is a bad idea. That applies to any bug, not just selinux ones.
> It doesn't need to be some maintainer who does that, anyone who is going
> to use the package can take a moment to do the sign off, assuming that
> there's a process to identify people as capable of installing a package
> with selinux enabled (lots of folks), and willing to do so (still
> hopefully a non-empty set).
There should be something in the packaging guidelines or the package
review process about testing with selinux enabled. (If there isn't already.)
> If Fedora is going to ship with SElinux enabled, it also should be
> working.
Just like anything else.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list