Folderview doesn't work with nvidia. Was prevent people from making mistakes?

Linuxguy123 linuxguy123 at gmail.com
Sun Dec 7 16:41:28 UTC 2008


On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 04:10 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Linuxguy123 wrote:
> > So I entered a bugzilla report on this issue and did a bit of background
> > research.   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473446  The
> > developer's response ?  They tagged the bug as UNFIXABLE.
> 
> Because that's what it is, the bug is in a proprietary driver we do not have
> the source for, there's no way we can fix anything in it.

So why are the developers writing software for hardware that doesn't
have a working driver ?

Does that sound production ready ?

And it isn't just that folderview runs slow.  In KDE4.1.3, it totally
freezes my UI. 

> Next time buy hardware with Free (as in speech) drivers.

And which laptop available high performance video card would that be ?

> > Do they create a mini application to help the end user tune their video
> > card to work properly ?  Nope.
> 
> How can we do this when the hardware is undocumented and the driver is
> proprietary?

The KDE FAQ states a few options that users have to tune their xorg.conf
files.  A simple app that added or removed those options from a GUI
would be greatly appreciated.   So would mention of this issue in the
F10 Release Notes.


> > Do they state that they have contacted NVidia and the issue is being
> > sorted out ?  Nope.
> 
> Why should we? It's up to you to contact NVidia (which is what we told you
> to do).

Again, is this a PRODUCTION READY strategy ?


> > Do they provide tips or a different version of folderview for people who
> > have video cards that don't support acceleration ?  Nope.
> 
> We provide a version of folderview which works with any graphics card with
> working drivers. If the driver is buggy, the driver needs to be fixed, not
> the folder view.

Leaving the end user screwed. 

> And it doesn't really use that much in terms of acceleration, as far as I
> know it's just basic XRender, not even OpenGL.
> 
> And there haven't actually been _any_ changes to the folderview applet
> between KDE 4.1.2 and 4.1.3, your regression must come from somewhere else
> (different version of the NVidia driver maybe?).

I'm an end user.  Should I have to look at code and regression stuff to
figure out what changed as to why folderview doesn't work. 

> > The user is left to figure things out for themselves.  Go manually play
> > around with your xorg.conf file.  Which has been the norm for nvidia
> > users since RH8 days, except that livna, now RPMFusion finally came to
> > the rescue recently.
> 
> That's because proprietary drivers are not, have never been and will never
> be supported in Fedora.

Yeah, but Fedora is responsible for shipping PRODUCTION READY stuff.
And if folderview doesn't work with nvidia hardware, I'd hardly call
that PRODUCTION READY.






More information about the fedora-list mailing list