infrastructure modest proposal

[Jeff Spaleta]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:47 AM, Tom Horsley <tom.horsley at att.net> wrote:
>> Isn't that sort of the intent of the "testing" repo?
>
> I dunno :-). Maybe we don't need another layer, maybe we just need
> the simple check for obvious dependency problems in "testing", but
> I think maybe the the associated packages might be in "testing"
> already, yet they weren't marked to go to "updates" at the same time.

Fact: the push of dbus directly to stable was a mistake.. it was not intentional

Adding yet another repository between testing and stable will not help
situations where testing was not used.  You are adding complexity
which does not solve the underlying problem.

-jef