packagekit

Alex Makhlin makhlina at gmail.com
Thu Dec 11 21:30:04 UTC 2008


Thierry wrote:
> Alex Makhlin a écrit :
>   
>> Look, I feel for you man! After the latest updates its been a bit
>> crazy. It seems to me that Fedora's team (aka Readhat Enterprise
>> developers) have let us down quite a bit! Look, if we are going to be
>> their QA team so they can make some great $$ from their Enterprise
>> distribution then they should get their act together.
>> We are now into the holidays, how many Readhat engineers are still
>> available until January? Not that many! In my opinion we have a long
>> wait to go before they fix their problems and ours. By the way, I
>> would like to use Readhat Enterprise instead of Fedora but at what $$?
>>
>>     
> especially when it's not a Red Hat developer who pushed the package by
> mistake and publicly apologized.  And the fix is being pushed right now.
> Fedora is not restricted to Red Hat. Frustration is ok, this bug has
> been a massive pain but /me think you're over reacting.
> you can always use CentOS if you don't want to pay for RH support...it's
> a rebuild of the official SRPMS minus the copyrighted stuff.
>
> nuff said
>
> T
>
>   
I can understand why you may think that I am over reacting. But why is a 
"Non ReadHat Developer" pushing such an important package through? In my 
company this would be outrageous!! First of all, how did they know that 
it was ready for distribution? What authority did they have and if so, 
why should I trust a company that would give such authority? ReadHat is 
responsible for this and not some scape goat!




More information about the fedora-list mailing list