FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX

Gerhard Magnus magnus at agora.rdrop.com
Sat Dec 13 15:04:23 UTC 2008


On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
> > From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
> > To: fedora-list at redhat.com
> > Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM
> > 
> >> I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few 
> >> months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on 
> >> a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, 
> >> but at least three required policy changes.
> >>
> > 
> > You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with 
> > SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs 
> > with SELinux. ;)
> > 
> > Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. 
> > Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable.
> > 
> Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from 
> updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues.
> 
> FIX!!
> 
> I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind 
> started without issues.
> 
As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but
installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Where
did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by "and
targeted"?




More information about the fedora-list mailing list