F10, VMware Server 2.0, and selinux
Ed Greshko
Ed.Greshko at greshko.com
Wed Dec 17 04:39:03 UTC 2008
Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
> Sight.
> The OP talked about reporting SELinux issues w/ VMWare to bugzilla.redhat.com.
> This constitute spending Fedora resources (read: Fedora's SELinux
> maintainer's time) on supporting VMWare's decision.
>
>
Only *if* the developer chooses to do the work. Nothing suggests that
the person needs to or is compelled to do so. You are reaching.
FWIW, the latest Version: 2.0 | 2008/10/29 | Build: 122956. If memory
serves me, F10 was released mid-November. So, even if VMWare did
support Fedora it would be unreasonable to expect the current release of
Workstation to support F10.
--
Be careful what you set your heart on -- for it will surely be yours. --
James Baldwin, "Nobody Knows My Name" Mei-Mei.Greshko at greshko.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081217/907ee933/attachment-0001.sig>
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list