is KDE dead - did Gnome win?
Vnpenguin
vnpenguin at vnoss.org
Fri Dec 26 21:11:03 UTC 2008
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:32 PM, Arthur Pemberton <pemboa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Timothy Murphy <gayleard at eircom.net> wrote:
>> MKas wrote:
>>
>>> I like KDE, but what I see:
>>>
>>> bash-3.2# yum remove *gnome*
>>
>> Surely you don't have to remove *gnome* in order to use KDE?
>
>
> True. But it makes the arguement that KDE in Fedora is vibrant more
> difficult when you can't have KDE without Gnome.
>
> bluez i386 4.19-1.fc10 installed 979 k
> firefox i386 3.0.5-1.fc10 installed 14 M
> firstboot i386 1.102-1.fc10 installed 652 k
> kdeutils i386 6:4.1.3-1.fc10 installed 5.6 M
> setroubleshoot noarch 2.0.12-3.fc10 installed 275 k
> system-config-date noarch 1.9.34-1.fc10 installed 3.8 M
> system-config-keyboard noarch 1.2.15-4.fc10 installed 189 k
> system-config-network noarch 1.5.93-2.fc10 installed 1.8 M
> system-config-printer i386 1.0.12-2.fc10 installed 1.6 M
> system-config-samba noarch 1.2.67-3.fc10 installed 2.1 M
> system-config-services noarch 0.99.28-3.fc10 installed 1.5 M
> xulrunner i386 1.9.0.5-1.fc10 installed 22 M
>
> None of the above should need gnome libs to work. gtk libs, sure.. but
> not Gnome.
>
Yes, I have a lot of *gnome* package in my customized XFCE *only*
desktop spin :-)
That's the life, I have to live with :-)
--
http://vnoss.org
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list