some feedback on fedora 10

[Rahul Sundaram]

Lonni J Friedman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:57 AM, Rahul Sundaram
> <sundaram at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> Tom Horsley wrote:
>>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:37:34 -0800
>>> Russell Miller <duskglow at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> 4)  KMS seems cool, but it doesn't work on my card, so it falls back to a
>>>> lame progress bar on the bottom of the screen.  Can we be a little more
>>>> informative than that?  It didn't even tell me I could press escape, I had
>>>> to figure that out on my own.
>>> Wait, is this the boot time "plymouth" stuff you are talking about?
>>> All I've ever seen on any system was a lame progress bar (3 colors,
>>> but still lame). I've really wondered what all the plymouth hoopla
>>> was about. It can sometimes do more than a progress bar? (Not that
>>> I care much, one of the first things I always do is remove the rhgb
>>> option so I can actually see information on the screen if something
>>> goes wrong).
>> Read the release notes. You can use vga=ask or vga=0x380 for any system to
>> get a framebuffer based progress bar. Removing rhgb is unnecessary since it
>> automatically shows any errors if and when it happens. For more details on
>> Plymouth, refer
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=fedora_plymouth&num=1
>> (video included)
>> http://fedoramagazine.wordpress.com/2008/10/21/interview-fedora-10s-better-startup/
> 
> I think you're missing the point. Not everyone wants Fedora to be a
> shiny happy Microsoft Windows clone.  Not everyone wants X.

You didn't even read the references I guess.

Rahul