Some people mis interpret Fedora's Mission Statement.

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 01:24:13PM -0500, homburg at tips-Q.com wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 09:49:20 -0700
> stan <goedigi89__e at cox.net> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > Now, it is good that you care enough about Fedora to
> > offer suggestions, but if you don't help implement those 
> > suggestions you shouldn't be offended or angry if they 
> > aren't followed.
> > 
> It's kind of a circular, symbiotic scheme. Installing FC on
> my laptop and filing bug reports from time to time allows
> Red Hat to develop RHEL. RHEL facilitates CentOS which is
> installed on my server and performs flawlessly.
> 
> Those who wish to separate FC from Red Hat are unrealistic.
> Red Hat is a publicly held company with responsibilities to
> its shareholders. Without their sponsorship, FC becomes
> impossible. I have tried just about every distro. I keep
> coming back to FC. The only one that has its own
> unique virtues (IMO - YMMV) is GenToo but it can be a major
> PITA. BTW, I heartily recommend that every newbie install
> Gentoo to a virtual machine. It is a terrific learning
> experience.

Keep in mind there's no "C" in Fedora anymore.  It's just "Fedora,"
and has been since Fedora 7 back in 2007. :-)

Paul
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20081208/4e9d8b03/attachment-0001.sig>