FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS - FIX

[Bill Davidsen]

Gerhard Magnus wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 11:19 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Gerhard Magnus wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 19:39 -0500, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>>> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>>>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>>>> Subject: Re: FC9 - recent upgrade breaks NFS
>>>>> From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
>>>>> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
>>>>> Date: 12/12/2008 01:20 PM
>>>>>
>>>>>> I try not to be a whiner, but this is about the forth time in a few 
>>>>>> months that someone has released a package without ever testing it on 
>>>>>> a system with SElinux enabled. Some of those may be multiple reports, 
>>>>>> but at least three required policy changes.
>>>>>>
>>>>> You'll be happy to know that I've joined QA and I run systems with 
>>>>> SELinux off and enforcing. There's at least one tester now that runs 
>>>>> with SELinux. ;)
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I use NFS (between SCO Unix, too) and use the machines daily. 
>>>>> Hopefully I'll stop a lot of these bugs from hitting stable.
>>>>>
>>>> Thank you! And if it will be useful I can offer to install thing from 
>>>> updates-testing on an FC10 VM, which seem to find many if not all issues.
>>>>
>>>> FIX!!
>>>>
>>>> I installed selinix-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm (and targeted) and rpcbind 
>>>> started without issues.
>>>>
>>> As a workaround, I've (temporarily) put selinux in permissive mode but
>>> installing selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm seems safer. Wheres
>>> did you find it? (Google is no help.) What do you mean by "and
>>> targeted"?
>>>
>> yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade selinux-*
>>
>> That will install
>>   selinux-policy-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm
>>   selinux-policy-targeted-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm
>> and possibly, if you have it installed,
>>   selinux-policy-devel-3.3.1-115.fc9.noarch.rpm
>>
>> Now your system works again for NFS.
> 
> This works fine for me except on the box running the 64 bit FC9. Then I
> get:
> 
Looks like the x86-64 repos are either messaged up (I see you have the out of 
date repomod.xml issue I see of x86-32bit), but it looks like you have both 
livna and rpmfusions stuff enabled by default, so you may have a total mishmash 
of conflicting packages from various places.

Can't help with that issue at all, works for x86 using Fedora repos.

> [88] /home/magnusg $ yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade
> selinux-*
> Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit
> livna                                                    | 2.1 kB  00:00
> fedora                                                   | 2.4 kB  00:00
> rpmfusion-free-updates                                   | 2.7 kB  00:00
> rpmfusion-nonfree-updates                                | 2.7 kB  00:00
> rpmfusion-free                                           |  951 B  00:00
> updates-newkey                                           | 2.3 kB  00:00
> Not using downloaded repomd.xml because it is older than what we have:
>   Current   : Wed Dec 10 22:27:31 2008
>   Downloaded: Tue Dec  2 16:12:33 2008
> updates-testing-newkey                                   | 2.3 kB  00:00
> rpmfusion-nonfree                                        |  951 B  00:00
> updates                                                  | 2.6 kB  00:00
> Setting up Upgrade Process
> No Packages marked for Update
> 
> and still get error messages when starting NFS while booting:
> 
> NFS statd                    FAILED
> mounting NFS filesystems: mount.nfs internal error
> mount.nfs internal error     FAILED
> 


-- 
Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
   "We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked."  - from Slashdot