Pulseaudio(?) vs. Flash vs. Amarok
Tim
ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au
Mon Dec 15 10:19:26 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-12-15 at 04:53 -0500, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> Yes, but isn't PulseAudio also supposed to provide fake device files so
> programs that do this can't actually get exclusive control and instead
> use PulseAudio (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PulseAudio)?
That won't help if something else grabs the hardware directly. There's
still several different ways that the sound hardware can be accessed.
>From what I've seen (trying out different audio software), there's fakes
for alsa, but things that access OSS seem to directly use it, if I've
remembered the right ones.
--
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.7-53.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list