is KDE dead - did Gnome win?

[Arthur Pemberton]

On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Ian Pilcher <arequipeno at gmail.com> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> Taking note that 'removed functionality' is not the same as 'has not
>> yet been added back', what functionality do you need that has been
>> removed from KDE 4.x?
>
> If it hadn't been removed, it wouldn't need adding back.

Well just needs adding, not adding back. They started the code base
fresh as far as I understand... which means it hasn't been removed.

> Proper dual-head support is the omission that affects me the most right
> now.  This is an area in which KDE 3.5 is far ahead of GNOME.  OTOH, I
> find KDE 4 to be completely unusable on a dual-head setup.


I thought dual head was mostly an X issue.

-- 
Fedora 9 : sulphur is good for the skin
( www.pembo13.com )