WiFi LAN access, but not WAN access.
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED
m_d_berger_1900 at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 18 19:29:14 UTC 2008
On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:29:47 +0000, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:54:04 +0000, Da Rock wrote:
>>> To: fedora-list at redhat.com
>>> From: m_d_berger_1900 at yahoo.com
>>> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 04:48:05 +0000 Subject: WiFi LAN access, but
>>> not WAN access.
>>> On FC8 with my dual boot laptop, in the process of testing
>>> wpa_supplicant with my Actiontec router, I had a situation in which I
>>> could ping within my LAN, but but not the WAN. Other boxes on my LAN,
>>> had no problem contacting the WAN. So I shut of the encryption, and
>>> made unencrypted WiFi contact. Still, I could contact the LAN but not
>>> the WAN. Then I made a wired Ethernet connection from the test laptop.
>>> In that case, everything worked for WAN and LAN. Then I went back to
>>> wireless. It all worked, with and without encryption.
>>> So I am living happily ever after, but I fear I may be in a fool's
>>> paradise. Any suggestions?
>>> fedora-list mailing list
>>> fedora-list at redhat.com
>>> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>> What is your dhcp settings for the wifi? Same as lan? Also check route
>> settings- is the gateway correct for wifi? I had to set my dhclient to
>> supersede gateway so that I had wan access on both lan and wlan.
>> Hope that helps- maybe. Any further info (inc. vague topology) and or
>> config might help to work out your sit.
> I am running a dual boot laptop with WinXP and FC8. WinXP makes the
> connection with no problem. I have tested both DHCP and static IP, and
> I get the same results.
> I have, I think, solved the problem. It appears that both
> wpa_supplicant and Network Service Control must me manually activated.
> Network Service Control showing "Active" is not good enough. Depending
> on the sequence of things, it may be necessary to click Deactivate (if
> this closes the window, reopen it) and then click Activate. It then
> becomes fully functional.
> I hope this is cleaned up in future versions.
I add that while this worked for my Actiontec router, I have not
gotten by Vigor 2910G to work with it.
More information about the fedora-list