Updates

[Ron Siven]

On Jan 13, 2008 10:02 PM, Ed Greshko <Ed.Greshko at greshko.com> wrote:

> Craig White wrote:
> > and by the way, feel free to help out Karl with his conflicts. I'm
> > heading to bed
> >
> OK....
>
> As noted in an earlier message, I managed to recreate what I believe is
> Karl's original problem.  In doing so I've rediscovered what others are
> probably fully aware of, but I am not for the simple reason that I don't
> use either the freshrpms or livna repos...
>
> Simply put, (feel free to respond with "I told you so") both repos
> contain vlc, x264 and other packages.  These repos are mutually
> exclusive.  Unless you are interested in inflicting pain on yourself do
> not, at any time, enable both.  And never, ever....unless you know what
> you are doing use more than one of these on your installed system.  Pick
> one...and stay with it.
>
> So, Karl, unless you really know what you've done (as in kept detailed
> notes) you may best be served by starting over again and picking ONE of
> these repos and using it and only it.  As you've stated, you're not
> smart enough to deal with the complexities that are introduced by using
> multiple 3rd party repos.
>
>
> --
> No house is childproofed unless the little darlings are in straitjackets.
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list at redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>


Question:  Would you still deem it unacceptable to have both of these repos
enabled  even if one were using the  yum-priorities plugin?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080113/1781a4d9/attachment-0001.htm>