[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Freeswan (CentOS 4.5)

--- tony chamberlain lemko com wrote:

> Has anyone had experience with Freeswan?
> We have a situation where say there is a Linux machine in City 1 with IP address (for
> example)
> and a Linux machine in City 2 with an IP address of (for example). Now these machines
> are
> in different cities, so machine 1 cannot just open a socket on because machine 2 is on
> a different
> network. Each machine does have a router, say City 1 is (for example). To get into
> City 1from
> outside the network you go through thr router, use which routes into the LAN. The
> same for
> City 2. For a unix process on to send to it would have to send to
> which would route
> it in. Problem is, its from address would be, which the machine at wouldn't
> know about.
> A process on would have to do something similar to respond.
> Now these machines have to actually be able to use each others' 10.0.0.X addresses. I assume
> this is possible
> via a VPN. They don't have any Cicsco VPNs or anything, and they asked whether it is possible
> just using
> Linux (CentOS) to set up a VPN. I did a bit of searching and found a couple things. Freeswan
> seemed to be
> the most promising, though other packages could be just as good.
> Is the above scenario possible with Freeswan or can you recommend some other way?
> Thanks
Wouldn't port fowarding work here?


Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]