Email delivery (sendmail->procmail->$HOME/mbox) with fallback

John Summerfield debian at herakles.homelinux.org
Tue Jan 8 06:18:50 UTC 2008


Tim Alberts wrote:
> John Summerfield wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Google for terms such as "reliable linux" "high availability linux" 
>>>> "linux cluster" etc for more details.
>>> Google'd and Yahoo'd...seen hundreds of ideas mostly based on 
>>> heartbeat.  In fact I most recently was looking into Red Hat's Global 
>>> File System and clustering:
>>>
>>> http://www.redhat.com/gfs/
>>> http://www.redhat.com/cluster_suite/
>>>
>>> Trying to figure out how Red Hat is accomplishing these things with 
>>> open source, or if they are adding their own proprietary background 
>>> stuff.
>>
>> Look at CentOS. If it's in that (I believe it is) then it's OSS.
> 
> Now completely off topic..I just read a bit on CentOS website.  Am I 
> correct in thinking that they're litterally redistributing what RedHat 
> Enterprise is?  Even their documentation is cut/paste from RedHat with 
> RedHat logo's.  I love the phrase they use 'prominent North American 
> Enterprise Linux vendor'.

RHEL is built by RH from RH source. CentOS is built by the CentOS team 
from RH source, as far as licencing and trademarks allow. They are 
obliged to make some changes.

I think the term 'prominent North American  Enterprise Linux vendor' 
arose following some nastiness from RH lawyers.

At the time of RHL 7.x, I could download it from RH and install it on my 
machines, and I was running RHL. I could burn CDs and distribute them at 
a LUG and that too was RHL. However, if I had a few left over and sold 
them to a few mates, even at a nominal price, that was _not_ RHL.

That's RHL logic, not mine, and I believe it's a fair summary of RH 
guidelines of the time limiting the use of its trademarks. I imagine 
they're substantially the same now.


> 
> However this seems to answer my question about what RedHat Enterprise 
> really is..all open source.

_Mostly_ open source. Someone who has RHEL4 or 5 might comment in what 
is in RHEL that's not (likely) in the equivalent CentOS.

> 


-- 

Cheers
John

-- spambait
1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu  Z1aaaaaaa at coco.merseine.nu
-- Advice
http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375

You cannot reply off-list:-)




More information about the fedora-list mailing list