Encrypting a partition

Luciano Rocha strange at nsk.no-ip.org
Thu Jan 10 15:11:22 UTC 2008


On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:56:33PM +0900, Msquared wrote:
> I know this thread is aging a bit, but I thought I'd post some comments,
> and link to an article I just put online:
> 
>   http://www.msquared.id.au/articles/cryptroot/

Why does it require javascript?

> 
> > Then add it to /etc/crypttab:
> > chome /dev/volgroup/home none
> 
> With my article, you don't need anything in crypttab (including keys or
> other sensitive information).

I didn't see anything on that page that specified to the system to mount
the encrypted home on boot.

> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 09:11:17AM -0800, Alan wrote:
> 
> > Does encrypting swap interfere with hibernate or sleep mode on laptops?
> > (Just asking in case I ever get sleep or hibernate working on my
> > laptop.)
> 
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 05:43:10PM +0000, Luciano Rocha wrote:
> 
> > If you wish for a encrypted swap allowing suspend, you'll have to place
> > a constant key in crypttab (which isn't secure, unless you also encrypt
> > the root), and check if the resume scripts support that case or manually
> > add it (not trivial).
> 
> If you encrypt the swap itself using a random key each boot, you will have
> problems.  If you use a constant key in crypttab, then you don't have any
> security unless the crypttab itself (or rather, the filesystem that
> contains it) is also encrypted.

Yes, I did mention just that.

> If you use the method used in my article above, you should be able to
> hibernate and resume without any problems

Using LUKS for swap? It's an interesting idea, but I'd still like to
nuke the contents of the swap on new boot.

> I've tried and it worked for me, even with a dual-boot.  In fact, I was
> able to sleep Windows and resume Linux and vice versa for a much faster
> way to switch from Windows to Linux (and vice versa).  Of course, my
> Windows partition isn't encrypted, but I don't use Windows as much.

More information about the subject is always welcome. The ideal thing
would be for upstream support for the most usual methods mentioned
(including during install).

-- 
lfr
0/0
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080110/19a80963/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list