[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Double messages

On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:23 -0500, Mark C. Allman wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 17:50 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > On 22/01/2008, Fran├žois Patte <francois patte math-info univ-paris5 fr> wrote:
> > > It is time to have a moderator on this list....
> > 
> > +1
> > 
> +1
> I just posted about a sound issue I'm having and I had to think about
> the wording, so as to not cause someone to go off the deep end.
> "Someone" could be anybody.  I have to think about what I'm typing even
> here just to be 110% sure I'm not implying anything.
No - if you don't participate in the exchange, you aren't part of it.

If you want safe, moderated exchange, then go to forums..

E-mail is sort of self-policing and when someone wants to go against the
flow of expectations, this is the way the self-policing occurs. It's
participatory if you choose, good spectator sport of you like, or pretty
easy to delete if you are uninterested.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]