SELinux alerts

Brian Chadwick brianchad at westnet.com.au
Sat Jan 26 08:55:08 UTC 2008


Colin Paul Adams wrote:
> I just installed (via yum) and started squid.
>
> I then noticed I had some SELinux alert
>
> Summary
>     SELinux is preventing /usr/sbin/squid (squid_t) "read write" to socket
>     (unconfined_t).
>
> Detailed Description
>     SELinux denied access requested by /usr/sbin/squid. It is not expected that
>     this access is required by /usr/sbin/squid and this access may signal an
>     intrusion attempt. It is also possible that the specific version or
>     configuration of the application is causing it to require additional access.
>
> Allowing Access
>     You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see
>     http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385 Or you can disable
>     SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not
>     recommended. Please file a http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
>     against this package.
>
> Additional Information        
>
> Source Context                system_u:system_r:squid_t:s0
> Target Context                system_u:system_r:unconfined_t:s0
> Target Objects                socket [ unix_stream_socket ]
> Affected RPM Packages         squid-2.6.STABLE17-1.fc8 [application]
> Policy RPM                    selinux-policy-3.0.8-44.fc8
> Selinux Enabled               True
> Policy Type                   targeted
> MLS Enabled                   True
> Enforcing Mode                Enforcing
> Plugin Name                   plugins.catchall
> Host Name                     susannah.colina.demon.co.uk
> Platform                      Linux susannah.colina.demon.co.uk 2.6.23.1-42.fc8
>                               #1 SMP Tue Oct 30 13:18:33 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64
> Alert Count                   1
> First Seen                    Sat 26 Jan 2008 06:39:04 GMT
> Last Seen                     Sat 26 Jan 2008 06:39:04 GMT
> Local ID                      b8ea13f6-922f-4bb8-a448-09e80221eb2a
> Line Numbers                  
>
> and additional similar alerts for sh (xdm), ntpd, and /usr/bin/gcin
>
> Is it safe to ignore these?
>   
I run squid and ignore this message ... looks like something the Fedora 
guys will fix eventually.




More information about the fedora-list mailing list