that old GNU/Linux argument
akelly at corisweb.org
Tue Jul 15 07:36:35 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 23:25 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2008, Tim <ignored_mailbox at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
<snip for brevity>
> Except that what you call Linux software isn't actually for Linux.
> Have you ever heard of Nexenta (GNU/kOpenSolaris), Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD, and even UnixWare?
> If you take *GNU* libc, rebuild it to target a different kernel while
> exporting the same ABI, and voila, you can drop Linux entirely from
> what you call a Linux Operating System, and pretty much all
> applications will still work just the same. Because they're not
> applications for Linux. They're applications for GNU libc. They
> couldn't care less that they're running on top of the kernel Linux.
> For them, the kernel is irrelevant.
> Next frequently raised fallacious objections?
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you "the sound of a shoe dropping".
That was a fabulous exchange, very well stated, very well explained.
Alexandre, very impressed with your ability to avoid vitriolic and
abusive tone. Very impressed.
More information about the fedora-list