Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
John Cornelius
jc at hangarpilot.net
Fri Jul 18 00:00:49 UTC 2008
John Burton wrote:
> You can go back to the "Text Book" definition from Andrew Tennebaum
> (sp?) who wrote the text book on Operating Systems used by most CS
> courses. That definition is pretty close to what John originally
> described. This parallels my original question of what causes people
> to claim the O/S is "GNU/Linux". While I certainly agree that there
> are alot of GNU tools packaged with Linux, those tools are also used
> by alot of other O/Ss that people are not making similar claims about...
It's Andy Tanenbaum and in 1992 he wrote a scathing post on Linux. Linus
responded and the exchange continued with a few others chiming in for
over a week, not unlike the current discussion. Andy's primary complaint
about Linux was that it wasn't a micro kernel operating system and Linus
called the assertion brain dead I believe. The discussion became quite
impolite but they apparently agreed that the kernel and its interface
and management software (including the file system) were the operating
system and everything else was something else. The exchange can be found
at www.dina.kvl.dk/~abraham/Linus_vs_Tanenbaum.html if you're interested
in historical trivia.
John Cornelius
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list