zephod at cfl.rr.com
Fri Jul 18 12:47:58 UTC 2008
> ---- max <maximilianbianco at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2 - The only other sane thing I could advise you too do is bounce your
> > question off the fedora-selinux list. I would include a reference to
> > this thread and all the relevant details. The kernel your running, the
> > policy version (rpm -qa | grep selinux...setrouble) , setroubleshoot
> > version, the error messages below , and that you run in permissive and
> > used preupgrade to go from f8 to f9.
> > This will ensure that the right people see your message, this list is
> > also monitored but I think when they get busy fedora-selinux is likely
> > to still get checked more often than fedora-list.
> I was trying to avoid this. I already get several hundred e-mails per day and I would guess that the selinux list is pretty busy too. Oh well, I'll just have to deal with it for a while.
I found this in the SELinux list archives:
which appears to say there was a problem but it was fixed in a patch. I wonder if it has not made it to F9 yet?
More information about the fedora-list