Why is Fedora not a Free GNU/Linux distributions?
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
rms at 1407.org
Thu Jul 24 13:11:39 UTC 2008
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 07:47:45AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 10:29:26PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> In general the terms I'm speaking of are more permissive than the GPL
>>> and the GPL is the one that was intentionally incompatible, but
>>> that's not the point. The point is that the work-as-a-whole clause
>>> is an immoral restriction.
>> Don't include GPL'ed software, then.
> OK, but how is the useful to anyone?
It is useful to hundreds of thousands of developers of software under
compatible licenses who do include it, so I reject your premise that
it isn't useful to anyone.
Today is Setting Orange, the 59th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3174
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?
More information about the fedora-list