fedora errors
Ian Malone
ibmalone at gmail.com
Sat Jul 26 21:09:41 UTC 2008
2008/7/11 Rick Stevens <ricks at nerd.com>:
> Mark Haney wrote:
>>
>> Glen Grantham wrote:
>>>
>>> My system is an AMD 64 Athlon X2 4600+ on a
>>> GIGABYTE S-Series GA-MA74GM-S2H motherboard
>>> with a 320GB EIDE WD Caviar SE 7200RPM Hard Drive
>>>
>>> 64 bit Fedora Linux Identity Kit
>>>
>>> ERROR List from upgrade after initial installing system with Fedora 8
>>>
>>> When I try to install the 280 or so upgraded pacaages I get this:
>>>
>>> file /usr/lib/libnm-util.so.0.0.0 from install of
>>> NetworkManager-glib-0.7.0-0.6.9.svn3675.fc8 conflicts with file from package
>>> NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.5.svn3030.fc8
>>> file /etc/dbus-1/system.d/NetworkManager.conf from install of
>>> NetworkManager-0.7.0-0.6.9.svn3675.fc8 conflicts with file from package
>>
>> Well, we didn't really need every single line, since most of them are
>> similar to the first 2 or three listed. However, try removing Network
>> Manager and then installing it. That should get you the upgraded version
>> and getting rid of the errors you are seeing.
>
> The problem is that NM does NOT provide the 32-bit libraries any more in
> the multilib (64- and 32-bit) environment. To fix:
>
> yum remove NetworkManager.i386
>
> since you don't need the 32-bit version. Then "yum update" should work.
>
I had the same problem with NetworkManager updates. I've just tried
'yum remove NetworkManager.i386' and, intriguingly:
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
=============================================================================
Removing:
NetworkManager i386 1:0.7.0-0.6.7.svn3370.fc8
installed 2.4 M
Removing for dependencies:
NetworkManager-glib i386 1:0.7.0-0.6.7.svn3370.fc8
installed 103 k
NetworkManager-openvpn i386 1:0.7.0-8.svn3302.fc8 installed
486 k
NetworkManager-vpnc i386 1:0.7.0-0.6.3.svn3109.fc8
installed 309 k
evolution i386 2.12.3-5.fc8 installed 36 M
As I don't use evolution on this machine (and probably have the 64bit
version anyway), I don't care too much, but this seems to be a bizarre
dependency chain.
--
imalone
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list