that old GNU/Linux argument
Alexandre Oliva
aoliva at redhat.com
Mon Jul 21 03:31:53 UTC 2008
On Jul 21, 2008, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> wrote:
> Björn Persson wrote:
>>
>> I don't think I'll get everyone to agree on a definition. I don't
>> even think all the anti-GNU/Linux folks will agree on a definition.
> I'm not sure there is an anti-GNU/Linux factor - just a pro "the other
> 85%" of the distro unwilling to give unfair naming rights.
Naming it after 2% is fair, while naming it after 15% isn't. Care to
explain the rationale behind this conclusion?
--
Alexandre Oliva http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Free Software Evangelist oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
FSFLA Board Member ¡Sé Libre! => http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list