ltsp and f9

[Jonathan Underwood]

2008/6/11 Langdon Stevenson <langdon at lindenrow.com.au>:
> Frank Cox wrote:
>>
>> It's my understanding that LTSP5 has now been incorporated into F9.
>>
>> Has anyone tried it out?  How does it compare to LTSP 4.2 and F8?  What
>> else
>> has to change when updating a currently-working LTSP 4.2/F8 server to F9?
>
> I would be interested to know too.  I am about to upgrade an F8 server to F9
> and will be setting up LTSP on it.  I was quite delighted to discover that
> it had been included in F9.  Fedora really does have a comprehensive package
> list.
>

Currently xdmcp is broken in GDM, and I think LTSP relies upon that
functionality, but I could be wrong. There's probably a workaround for
that in that you could use xdm or kdm instead, but I am not sure -
something to keep in mind though.