What linux lacks most - a decent remote fs
Dave Burns
tburns at hawaii.edu
Wed Mar 26 19:45:20 UTC 2008
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Robin Laing
<Robin.Laing at drdc-rddc.gc.ca> wrote:
> Tom Horsley wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 09:09:09 -0400
> > "Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak" <mjc at avtechpulse.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Mmm... I dream of an easy-to-use remote fs with automagical local caching...
> >
> > I dream of one that actually functions reliably. I can't believe
> > how widely used NFS is, because it is the source of endless problems
> > for me. I've never seen it work with any kind of reliability at all.
> > One thing I'll say for samba is that the data actually seems to show
> > up correctly on the other side :-).
> >
>
> I have just started to try sshfs. I cannot say if I like it or not but
> it is much easier to setup than NFS which I never got working correctly
> since FC4.
sshfs is a brilliant idea. I wonder about performance though.
Considering how simple and useful it is, I wonder why I never hear
anyone talking about it.
Dave
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list