Konqueror vs Firefox

David Boles dgboles at gmail.com
Thu Mar 6 21:03:42 UTC 2008


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tim wrote:
| On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 19:37 +0000, Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
|> On my FC7 and FC8 boxes, I have both Konqueror and
|> Firefox. Which should I use? Why?
|
| How long is a piece of string?  What you've asked is almost like Gnome
| versus KDE questions.
|
| I haven't used Konqueror for ages, but when I did, I found that it
| supported far less WWW technologies than Firefox did.  Or, supported
| them far worse.  e.g. Page styling, scripting, etc.  Try them both, and
| see what you think of them against each other.
|
| I have a strong aversion to applications that mix file managing and web
| browsing (i.e. Konqueror), like Microsoft did with Explorer.  You're
| never quite sure how many of the functions of one can be abused by the
| other.
|
| While it's not open-source, I have a slight preference for Opera over
| Firefox.  I find Firefox's propensity for jamming up and refusing you to
| let you do anything while some tabbed content is downloading, or
| rendering, to be extremely annoying.  e.g. You're reading some page,
| middle click on a link to load it up in the background in another tab,
| and while that's happening you're stuck, unable to scroll through the
| thing you were currently reading.


Loading a single page from a link on a page stops you from scrolling down
and continuing to read the first page? You need to look at your system
Tim. You have something very wrong.

I have forty online comics, from several newspapers, that I can load in
Firefox all at the same time while I read the articles on the news site
and I don't have a scroll problem.
- --


~  David
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)

iEYEARECAAYFAkfQXC4ACgkQAO0wNI1X4QFj9QCeNjDArBLulTBS9cQ4m/8BsKUE
vc8AoIulOWHEJ2qIeQ974zYrQ0K8Xb9V
=Q8dC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the fedora-list mailing list