Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 18:23:59 UTC 2008
Albert Graham wrote:
>
> I'm sorry that you don't understand my response,
Did you expect anyone to understand that your installations weren't typical?
> but I did actually take
> the time to visit the reference website you posted that "slated" the
> Fedora a distribution, It was clear to me that, that guy does not have a
> clue and is getting what he deserves, surely you understand that you
> should not be taking his advice - that would be a case of the blind
> leading the blind.
I didn't make the initial post with the reference. My comment was that
his seemed like a typical experience.
>>>
>>> The only real issue is a stable kernel for your requirements,
>>> everything else is less important, also I have a habit of running
>>> everything in user-space so it's a lot easier to virtualize or switch
>>> out the underlying OS if required.
>>
>> How do you virtualize "everything"? You have to have a real kernel
>> and device drivers somewhere. If that isn't an up-to-date fedora then
>> you are talking about something very different than it seems here.
And I'd still like to understand this part. Do you only recommend
fedora for people who can virtualize it?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list