Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?

Les Mikesell lesmikesell at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 18:23:59 UTC 2008


Albert Graham wrote:
> 
> I'm sorry that you don't understand my response,

Did you expect anyone to understand that your installations weren't typical?

> but I did actually take 
> the time to visit the reference website you posted that "slated" the 
> Fedora a distribution, It was clear to me that, that guy does not have a 
> clue and is getting what he deserves, surely you understand that you 
> should not be taking his advice - that would be a case of the blind 
> leading the blind.

I didn't make the initial post with the reference.  My comment was that 
his seemed like a typical experience.

>>>
>>> The only real issue is a stable kernel for your requirements, 
>>> everything else is less important, also I have a habit of running 
>>> everything in user-space so it's a lot easier to virtualize or switch 
>>> out the underlying OS if required.
>>
>> How do you virtualize "everything"?  You have to have a real kernel 
>> and device drivers somewhere. If that isn't an up-to-date fedora then 
>> you are talking about something very different than it seems here.

And I'd still like to understand this part.  Do you only recommend 
fedora for people who can virtualize it?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com




More information about the fedora-list mailing list