Fedora Makes a Terrible Server?
Arthur Pemberton
pemboa at gmail.com
Tue Mar 25 19:24:33 UTC 2008
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Ian Chapman
<packages at amiga-hardware.com> wrote:
> Roger Heflin wrote:
> >
> > The problem is that the enterprise OS's ship buggy kernels too, I have
>
> Of course they do, I'd be surprised to hear if anyone has shipped a 100%
> bug free kernel, whether it be Linux, Solaris, AIX, Windows or whatever.
> The point though is that RHEL is less of a moving target, if you current
> setup works then an update to the kernel is less likely to break
> anything, than say Fedora which frequently ships new versions of the
> kernel.
One would hope that that these people complaining abut imperfect
kernels in RHEL are find these bugs on their test boxes _before_ they
deploy to production.
> > And the second you add a driver and/or XFS on to RHEL5 you are
> > now tainted and *UNSUPPORTED*.
> Compared to Fedora where you are *UNSUPPORTED* at the offset?
is XFS even in the vanilla kernel?
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list