Linux is KING - Couldn't be hacked - Mac, Vista went down in flames
Arthur Pemberton
pemboa at gmail.com
Sun Mar 30 17:44:24 UTC 2008
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 3:56 AM, Manuel Aróstegui <manuel at todo-linux.com> wrote:
>
> El dom, 30-03-2008 a las 20:13 +1030, Tim escribió:
>
> > On Sat, 2008-03-29 at 19:04 -0600, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> > > I blame Microsoft and all the geeks who seem to feel for being geeks
> > > and want to dumb everything down.
> >
> > Those of us who remember personal computing before Microsoft was but
> > tiny company would probably agree that it was a bad idea to make
> > computers something the ignorant could play with, they used to be the
> > domain of experts and people actually interested in computing. Computer
> > systems need to be much better designed before it's going to be okay for
> > toy computing, both to protect the ignorant, and everyone else that they
> > interfere with.
>
> Yep, that's why I think that having a good windows administrator and a noob running a Linux server
> you'll have more possibilities to hack the linux machine than the
> Windows one.
>
> Again, out of the box and running both systems by default, it is obvious
> that Windows is going to suffer mucho more to keep itself clean.
>
> Arthur, this is the third time I say that I'm GLAD that they didn't hack
> the Linux box, but it doesn't mean that Linux is invincible and Windows
> can be easily hacked by a dog.
> There are probably out there servers owned by really good Windows
> sysadmins which are truly difficult to get compromised, and servers
> owned by dumb Linux sysadmins that get hacked every single week.
I still agree with you.
--
Fedora 7 : sipping some of that moonshine
( www.pembo13.com )
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list