PGP signatures.

[Tim]

On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 17:49 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote:
> It is important, though, to maintain the web-of-trust.  It does have
> legal implications, and that's why local signing is an option.  I use
> encryption for correspondence with one person, and for that I have to
> use ultimate trust, yet I've never met him.

I don't recall being required to "ultimately trust" someone to send them
encrypted mail.  I'd call that a foolhardy thing, too.  It'd be better
to set your mailer to trust people on your keyring - that affects what
you do with the keys, rather than inappropriately bodging the keys,
themselves.

-- 
[tim at bigblack ~]$ uname -ipr
2.6.23.15-80.fc7 i686 i386

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.
I read messages from the public lists.