should I bugzilla xcdroast

[Bill Crawford]

2008/5/27 John Aldrich <john at chattanooga.net>:

> What I had to do in FC6 and previous versions was to "chmod +s" on the
> XCDRoast executable. I know it's a "security risk" but dang it, I want to be
> able to burn CDs without having to be root! I believe the original (as in
> tarball version) XCD Roast does not need to be run as root or SUID root.

I found allowing RT priorities and large mlock() in
/etc/security/limits.conf fixed most or all of my disc burning issues
without needing setuid on binaries. YMMV, but something like:

*   hard    rtprio  100
*   hard    memlock 32768

and I repeated for "soft" to make sure it was there by default, but I
don't think that's actually necessary. Something similar is/was done
for jack a while back.