SOLVED: My nvidia driver for 2.6.27.5-117 has a problem...
Lonni J Friedman
netllama at gmail.com
Sat Nov 29 04:03:50 UTC 2008
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 9:31 AM, Linuxguy123 <linuxguy123 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> The solution was to tweak the xorg.conf file to what the rpmfusion
>> people say is needed. That means ensuring that the following exists in
>> the xorg.conf file:
>>
>> Section "Files"
>> ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia"
>> ModulePath "/usr/lib/xorg/modules"
>> EndSection
>>
>> I used the livna nvidia config application to generate my xorg.conf
>> file. I maintain that this is still a bug because that tool should
>> have generated a file that work, rather than one that needs tweaking.
>>
>> I don't think we can call Fedora/Linux a mainstream product until this
>> sort of low level twiddling is removed from the experience. Save your
>> breath if you are going to tell me that Fedora is not meant to be a
>> mainstream product.
>>
>> You can read their response to this here:
>> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=197
>>
>> Thanks to those that pointed me to the rpmfusion bugzilla.
>
> Of course I can't speak to your own experiance, but I upgraded my
> laptop which has a Quadro 570 in it and I did not have to mess with
> the xorg.conf file at all. I'm using the akmod package from rpmfusion.
> I"m also not suggesting that it's not an issue, just that it's not
> universal.
The RPMFusion package is broken if that hack is needed in xorg.conf.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman netllama at gmail.com
LlamaLand https://netllama.linux-sxs.org
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list