pine for FC9
Bill Davidsen
davidsen at tmr.com
Sat Oct 4 18:36:57 UTC 2008
Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Oct 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>> edwardspl at ita.org.mo wrote:
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> Do you know where can we d/l the pine rpm package for FC9 ?
>>
>> Livna but it is obsoleted by Alpine which is under a free and open
>> source (Apache) license.
>
> The University of Washington has dropped development of Alpine and laid
> off most, if not all, of the developers. Check the Alpine mailing list
> archives.
>
What's your point? The source is still available, the license is okay, why don't
you want to use it?
This is not a fast moving target, I ran one version I built from old source on
various machines for almost a decade. If there's a real need for fixes I suppose
it will move to sourceforge or similar, otherwise it's in a bunch of
distributions and usable as is.
I'm not sure there was a need for development other than a load of creeping
featurism, it is what it is and does well those things it does at all.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen at tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
More information about the fedora-list
mailing list