ssmtp problem

[Tim]

On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:09 -0600, kwhiskerz wrote:
> What got me started on this was that I had read an article about a
> 5-second linux boot and they said they had disabled sendmail and were
> using ssmtp instead with significant time saving.

Hmm, sendmail is very quick to start up, here.  Hardly even rates as
being a *delay*.  I'd suspect other things to be more of a problem:
Networks that don't start quick enough, and poor name resolution.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.