certification of signatures

[Tim]

Tim:
>> I'm curious about why you'd need to do it with a local key.

Todd Zullinger:
> I consider it preferable is that it prevents new users from signing
> the fedora key with a typical, exportable signature which they can
> easily leak to a keyserver¹ and cost themselves some credibility
> as a key signer.

That was the only reason that I could think of, accidentally
distributing it.  But I wondered if there was more to what you said.
Thanks.

-- 
[tim at localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.26.5-45.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.