Arranging icons on desktop

[Aaron Konstam]

On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 18:21 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 15:27 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 11:01 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 10:11 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
> > > > How in evolution to you tell the program to thread by In-Reply-To
> > > > header and not by subject?
> > > 
> > > Evo *always* threads by In-Reply-To where present and AFAIK this cannot
> > > be turned off. It only falls back to thread-by-subject when there's no
> > > In-Reply-To header.
> > > 
> > > > And if you thread by In-Reply-To hader threading how
> > > > can you tell when the thread ends (since subject line can change)?
> > > 
> > > Isn't that the whole point? If the In-Reply-To header indicates the
> > > message is part of a thread, then it *is* part of the thread, no matter
> > > what the Subject says. People changing the topic of the message (*not*
> > > the Subject, which is irrelevant in this scenario) are hijacking the
> > > thread.
> > > 
> > > poc
> > > 
> > That is not the answer to my question. The answer is that evolution
> > places in front of the subject line to delineate the beginning and end
> > of the thread,
> 
> This last sentence doesn't parse. What are you trying to say?
> 
> poc
> 
I was trying to answer the question (which I screwed up by leaving out
one or two words) of how the end of a thread is indicated in evolution.
Tim answers this in the next message.
--
=======================================================================
Eeny, Meeny, Jelly Beanie, the spirits are about to speak! -- Bullwinkle
Moose
=======================================================================
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akonstam at sbcglobal.net