Ntpdate fails to start

Björn Persson bjorn at xn--rombobjrn-67a.se
Sun Sep 7 13:42:55 UTC 2008


Paul Smith wrote:
> # /sbin/service ntpd status
> ntpd (pid 2059) is running...
> #
>
> ntpdate tries to start at booting. So, should I disable it? Which one
> of the two should I have running in order to have always a correct
> time on my computer?

If you usually leave your computer running and reboot it only when there's an 
update to Linux or GlibC, then you should use NTPD. It polls its servers 
periodically and keeps your clock synchronized. If you only turn the computer 
on for an hour every day, then it may be better to run NTPdate to set the 
clock at boot. Somewhere between these two extremes is a grey area. I don't 
know exactly where.

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080907/57bee195/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the fedora-list mailing list