KDE 4.1: Unacceptable !

[Aldo Foot]

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 5:27 PM, Mikkel L. Ellertson
<mikkel at infinity-ltd.com> wrote:
> Arthur Pemberton wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan
>> <pocallaghan at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2008-09-10 at 12:24 -0600, linuxguy wrote:
>>>> What is totally unacceptable is to ship an OS that totally lacks the
>>>> very basic functionality that one uses everyday.
>>> KDE is not an OS.
>>
>> I really didn't think anyone needed to address that. I kinda hopes the
>> OP was trying to make some point by using that wording, which I simply
>> didn't get.
>>
>> There are things that I don't like about KDE 4.1, speed is the biggest
>> one, crap, it is not.
>>
> From this and other posts, I don't think the OP "gets" the Fedora
> philosophy. Maybe Fedora is the wrong distribution for him? There is
> a reason there is more then one Linux distribution. It lets you
> chose the best match for your needs and desires.
>
> Mikkel
> --

I don't think there will ever be a unified opinion on this KDE 4.x thing.
I'll just keep going... and going.
Maybe there should be a disclaimer in fine print: "Use at your own risk"

~af