Should I disable the old updates repo?

[Mikkel L. Ellertson]

Aaron Konstam wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 09:42 -0500, Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote:
>> Aaron Konstam wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 08:23 -0500, Brian Millett wrote:
>>>> The old fedora-updates.repo ??  After the update hokey-pokey dance, all is just great, and
>>>> that's what its all about.  I'm happy.  But I noticed that the old, bad key, updates is
>>>> still active.
>>>>
>>>> Should that repo be deactivated?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks team for a job well done.
>>> Seems like the thing to do.
>>>
>> On my system, the update replaced the repo file. Look at the date of
>> the files in /etc/yum.repos.d
>>
> On mine the old one is still there.
> 
Are you sure? Check the time stamp on the files.

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  234 2008-05-18 21:42 dvd.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1907 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-development.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1168 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1186 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-newkey.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1078 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1259 2008-09-08 10:57
fedora-updates-testing-newkey.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1151 2008-09-08 10:57 fedora-updates-testing.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1904 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-devel.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1808 2007-11-07 10:11 livna.repo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2003 2007-11-07 10:11 livna-testing.repo

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080911/8ed5e7f3/attachment-0001.sig>