Git vs. Subversion. Which one?

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 06:33:20PM -0600, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >So I wanted to know about the public opinions on which one is better, Git or
> >Subversion as versioning control system (VCS?).  If you can, please come up
> >with some reasons too!  Like what benefits do you think your preferred one has
> >that the other one doesn't offer!
> 
> http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSvnComparsion

I started with CVS and soon after moved to SVN, which was quite an
improvement.  However, I recently learned git and would *never* go
back.  For starters, it's *much* faster than any other system.  The
use of branches is completely phenomenal.  And the ability to quickly
set up and host a repository for anyone with just some file copies to
any HTTP share is worth its weight in gold.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20080929/7704c9bf/attachment-0001.sig>